Tuesday, May 9, 2017

Vegetarianism

There are differences of opinion between Buddhists on this issue 
so we will attempt to present the arguments of those who believe 
that vegetarianism is necessary for Buddhists and those who do 
not. Vegetarianism was not a part of the early Buddhist tradition 
and the Buddha himself was not a vegetarian. The Buddha got his 
food either by going on alms rounds or by being invited to the 
houses of his supporters and in both cases he ate what he was 
given. Before his enlightenment he had experimented with various 
diets including a meatless diet, but he eventually abandoned them 
believing that they did not contribute to spiritual development.



The Nipata Sutta underlines this point when it says that it is 
immorality that makes one impure (morally and spiritually), not 
the eating of meat. The Buddha is often described as eating meat, 
he recommended meat broth as a cure for certain types of illness 
and advised monks for practical reasons, to avoid certain types of 
meat, implying that other types were quite acceptable. However, 
Buddhists gradually came to feel uncomfortable about meat eating. 
In 257 BC King Asoka said that in contrast to before, only two 
peacocks anda deer were killed to provide food in the royal kitchens 
and that in time even this would be stopped.

By the beginning of the Christian era meat eating had become unacceptable, particularly amongst the followers of the 
Mahayana although the polemics against it in works like the 
Lankavatara Sutra indicates that it was still widespread or a least 
a point ofcontroversy. Tantric text dating from the 7th and 8th 
centuries onward, frequently recommend both drinking alcohol and 
eating meat and both are considered fit to offer to gods. This was 
probably as much an expression of the freedom from convention 
which Tantra taught as it was a protest against Mahayanists to 
whom practices like abstaining from drink and meat had become a substitute for genuine spiritual change.

Today it is often said that Mahayanists are vegetarian and 
Theravadins are not. However the situation is a little more complex 
than that. Generally Theravadins have no dietary restrictions 
although it is not uncommon to find monks and lay people in Sri 
Lanka who are strict vegetarians. Others abstain from meat while 
eating fish. Chinese and Vietnamese monks and nuns are strictly 
vegetarian and the lay community try to follow there example 
although many do not. Amongst Tibetans and Japanese Buddhists vegetarianism is rare.

Buddhists who insist on vegetarianism have a simple and compelling argument to support their case. Eating meat encourages an industry 
that causes cruelty and death to millions of animals and a truly compassionate person would wish to mitigate all this suffering. By 
refusing to eat meat one can do just that.

Those who believe that vegetarianism is not necessary for Buddhists 
have equally compelling although more complex arguments to 
support their view. (1) If the Buddha had felt that a meatless diet 
was in accordance with the Precepts he would have said so and in the 
Pali Tipitaka at least, he did not. (2) Unless one actually kills an 
animal oneself (which seldom happens today) by eating meat one is 
not directly responsible for the animal's death and in this sense the 
non- vegetarian is no different from the vegetarian. The latter can 
only eat his vegetables because the farmer has ploughed his fields 
(thus killing many creatures) and sprayed the crop (again killing 
many creatures). (3) While the vegetarian will not eat meat he does 
use numerous other products that lead to animals being killed (soap,
leather, serum, silk etc.) Why abstain from one while using the others? 
(4) Good qualities like understanding, patience, generosity and 
honesty and bad qualities like ignorance, pride, hypocrisy, jealousy 
and indifference do not depend on what one eats and therefore diet is 
not a significant factor in spiritual development. Some will accept one pointof view and some another. Each person has to make up his or 
her own mind.

Ruegg, D.S. "Ahimsa and Vegetarianism in the History of Buddhism" in Buddhist Studies in Honour of Walpola Rahula. 
S. Balasooriya, (et.al) London, 1980;
P. Kapleau, To Cherish All Life, London, 1982.

No comments:

Post a Comment